All Play and No Work? Collaboration with the City University of Hong Kong

DIGARECs Dr. Sebastian Möring announces his collaboration as Co-Investigator with The City University of Hong Kong concerning All Play and No Work? The Ideas and Realties of Gamification. The project joins in with the ongoing research of Gamification in the Digital Research Center and will be funded until the end 2019.

The project will be realized with:

Dr. Olli Tapio Leino from the City University of Hong Kong (Principal-Investigator):
Dr. Espen Aarseth from the IT University of Copenhagen, Center for Computer Games Research (Co-Investigator):

A description of the project can be read here:

Traditionally play and games have been understood as frivolous, creative, free, separate from everyday life, and standing in contrast to productive activities like work and education.
Many are familiar with the thrilling excitement of taking risks on a whim, knowing that it’s “only a game”.
Recently, a movement often referred to as ’gamification’, or, ’ludification’, i.e. the use of game elements in non-game contexts, has emerged, promising that the ‘magic’ of game-playing could be added into productive activities to make them more enjoyable, efficient, and productive.
Conference talks on gamification have garnered millions of views on Youtube, and, sparked an ever-growing body of professional literature, instructing how to radically transform productive activities. While design practitioners and engineers have embraced gamification and published a number of interdisciplinary anthologies, there are no humanities-based scholarly monographs theorizing gamification and its implications.
Vocabulary for a critical study of gamification is lacking, and many questions distinguishing between ideas and realities of gamification have not received the attention they warrant. Is it without problems to harness play, with all the frivolity it entails, to serve the concerns of production and efficiency? Would it not undermine the very nature of play as an ’oasis of happiness’? Is blending of play and non-play theoretically possible? If not, what actually happens when an activity is ’gamified’? Does gamification make actual use of established ‘game mechanics’? Does gamification have something to teach us about technological play and games?
Theorizing gamification seems to involve addressing the liminality between play and non-play, and so touches upon questions regarding the role of play in human endeavors.
We propose a project resulting in a theoretically and empirically grounded critical review of gamification and in a methodological approach that can be repeated by others. Our expertise and track record in computer game studies, existential philosophy, and play theory seems very well suited for answering the above questions.
Work is structured into four phases, where subsequent phases validate the preceding ones: theoretical model-building based on synthesis of existing insights, cataloguing examples of gamification into a typology, case studies of relevant examples, and reflection.
Considering gamification as ‘test case’, we will also shed light on other contemporary forms of technological play such as “free-to-play games”, and, on established work/play hybrids, such as “serious” and “educational games”, gambling, and professional (e-)sports. Our findings will also help practitioners and policymakers to explore what can be realistically expected from gamification’s transformative capabilities.

Videos zur Ringvorlesung “Computerspiele als didaktische Herausforderung” jetzt online

Die Ringvorlesung “Computerspiele als didaktische Herausforderung” aus dem SoSe 2017 ist jetzt mit Ausnahme von zwei Sitzungen als Videomitschnitt verfügbar.

Um zu den einzelnen Videos zu gelangen, klicken Sie bitte auf den jeweiligen Hyperlink:

25.4.2017 Prof. Dr. Heiko Christians (Universität Potsdam): „Historische Medienbildung als Zukunftsperspektive in Schule und Universität. Ein Vorschlag”

2.5.2017 Dr. Sebastian Möring (Universität Potsdam/ Digital Games Research Center): ”Was verstehen wir, wenn wir Computerspiele spielen? Zur Hermeneutik des Computerspielens”

9.5.2017 Prof. Dr. Jan Distelmeyer (FH Potsdam): „Kontrollieren. Zur Interaktivität von Computerspielen”

16.5.2017 Heiko Brendel, M.A., M.S.Sc.(Universität Potsdam) “4X-Geschichtsspiele im Schulunterricht – Eine Brücke zwischen Geschichte, Geografie und Politischer Bildung?”

23.5.2017 Prof. Dr. Judith Ackermann (FH Potsdam): “Beeinträchtigungen spielerisch erfahrbar machen. Mit Computerspielen das Thema ‘Inklusion’ im Unterricht behandeln.”

30.5.2017 Prof. Dr. Rune Nielsen (IT-Universität Kopenhagen)”Video Game Addiction: a historical and critical analysis”

13.6.2017 Paul Dalg (Leiter ”Spielverderber Jugendschutz – Juristische und praktische Grenzen beim Einsatz von Videospielen im Schulunterricht”

20.6.2017 Martin Thiele-Schwez, M.A. (Hochschule für Bildende Künste Braunschweig/Playing History):”Playing History – wie wir mit Spielen Geschichte(n) vermitteln”

11.7.2017 Melanie Fritsch, M.A. (Universität Bayreuth): „Gitarrensimulanten und Daumenartisten? Überlegungen zum Einsatz von Computerspielen im Musik-, Instrumental- und Sportunterricht”

18.7.2017 Prof. Dr. Nathanael Riemer (Universität Potsdam): ”Mit den Göttern zocken. Religion in Computerspielen. Einsatzmöglichkeiten und Grenzen im Unterricht”


© 2008-2017 DIGAREC